Here's something interesting... I saw an article on Yahoo's front page yesterday that some high school somewhere was trying to get rid of the 'F' on the grading scale. I didn't really care about this and I did not read the article - that's not really what this post is about. Here's what I want to know... Why has there never been an 'E' on the grading scale?
Obviously the scale is alphabetic and has nothing to do with acronyms or abbreviations.... basically, it is just a letter grade assigned to a range of percentage points, I suppose for clearer presentation and to allow for some "wiggle room" within the range (i.e. 90-100% = A, 80-90% = B, etc.). It's quite obvious to start at the top with an A, and then follow in succession with the B,C,D. I guess I get that an F can stand for Fail, or Flunk, but why not an 'E'? Is there too much latitude with a 6-letter system? Does 'F' just have that much more punch over 'E'? Maybe it seems that way since we're used to hearing "eff" in that hard tone and it carrying such a negative connotation... Is E a happier letter than F, tonally?
Either way I feel bad for the 'E' getting left out like that. I think when I have kids and they are in school, I will find a way to squeeze it in when they get report cards. Of course since an E would be just barely better than an F, I suppose I hope I never have to have that conversation with my future kids... as I would much prefer it if they were scholarly... like their old man!
I give this post an 'A'... feel free to give it an 'E' if you disagree.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Hey Chris, the letter "E" use to be on report cards, before the "A" came about. It stood for "excellence". I have several report cards from kindergarden, on up through grade school with "E"'s on them. I suppose I'm showing my age, but thought you'd be interested to know that they did exist. -Whendy
ReplyDeleteThanks for the input, Whendy. In my research I read that the A,B,C,D scale is used to correspond to the standard 4.0 GPA scale, with A = 3.1-4.0, B = 2.1-3.0, and so on. I read that the E is sometimes replaced with the F so as not to be confused with.... (drumroll).... Excellent for E. It is more apt to be compared to F for Fail, although those abbreviated indicators are not intended. Ergo following my logic.
ReplyDeleteI've never been in a system that gives out Es, but I could see it happening.